天猫

维持巅峰！TA：阿森纳引援选择即战力，宝贵的稳定性千金难求_我的网站

一 |     

    The USS Gerald R. Ford departs from Souda Naval Base near Chania on the island of Crete, Greece, on February 26, 2026. Photo: VCGUS President Donald Trump's reported push to reshape the US Navy's next-generation aircraft carriers - from moving the island to abandoning electromagnetic catapults in favor of steam-powered systems - could impose heavy engineering, financial and schedule costs, Chinese military affairs experts said, warning of a widening gap between political preferences and the realities of building some of the world's most complex warships.
The Washington Post reported on Saturday that the US Navy is considering a major redesign of its new Ford-class aircraft carriers to better match Trump's preferred aesthetic, with the president favoring ships that more closely resemble US carriers from the World War II era. One option under study would move the carrier's island farther forward, toward the middle of the ship.
US officials cited by the report warned that such a change could require billions of dollars in redesign costs and cause substantial delays. 
The potential island redesign comes only days after Trump ordered another far-reaching change to the Ford-class program. On Thursday, he signed a national security memorandum directing the Pentagon and Navy to develop a plan within 60 days to replace the Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS) with steam catapults and the Ford-class carriers' Advanced Weapons Elevators with hydraulic systems, beginning with the future USS Doris Miller, or CVN-81, USNI News reported. 
Trump has repeatedly criticized EMALS as "too complex" and "not as effective as steam catapults," according to Reuters. 
But the order would reverse a technology path the US Navy has pursued for more than a decade. When the Navy selected EMALS in 2009, it said the system would lower overall lifecycle costs, require less maintenance than steam catapults and place less physical stress on carrier-based aircraft, per Reuters.
As of March 2026, the USS Gerald R. Ford had conducted 36,863 EMALS launches, according to Pentagon documents cited by Reuters. 
General Atomics, the manufacturer of EMALS, has warned against changing course on the Doris Miller, saying nearly 50 percent of production related to the system has already been completed and that a switch now would create significant cost, schedule and integration risks, according to Reuters. 
Zhang Junshe, a Chinese military affairs expert, told the Global Times on Sunday that the Ford-class carrier's aft-positioned island is not merely an aesthetic choice, but is closely tied to flight-deck efficiency and landing safety. "Moving the island farther aft creates more space around the catapults for aircraft parking and handling, helping shorten launch preparation time, while also reducing airflow disturbance during aircraft recovery," he said. 
Relocating the island forward would not be a simple cosmetic adjustment, but a major redesign affecting weight distribution, buoyancy, flight-deck layout and aerodynamics, with significant implications for both cost and schedule, Zhang noted.
Song Zhongping, another Chinese military affairs expert, told the Global Times that Trump's demand is one thing, but turning it into an actual warship design is another.
"The first four Ford-class carriers have either entered service or are already in different stages of construction, leaving very little room for fundamental changes to their overall designs," Song said. Even the fifth and sixth ships - the future USS William J. Clinton, CVN-82, and USS George W. Bush, CVN-83 - would face considerable cost and engineering consequences if the Navy attempts to overturn their established technological architecture, he said.
The US Navy officially announced the names of CVN-82 and CVN-83 in January 2025, per the US Navy official website. 
"There is an obvious gap between US President's political will and the engineering realities of aircraft-carrier construction," Song said.
Such proposed changes come as Ford-class construction timelines have already grown considerably compared with those of the preceding Nimitz class. The US Congressional Budget Office (CBO) said in April that Nimitz-class carriers typically took seven to eight years to build, while Ford-class ships are currently taking roughly 10 to 11 years. In a separate assessment released this month, the CBO estimated that future Ford-class carriers under the Navy's 2027 shipbuilding plan could cost about $22 billion apiece. 
"Electromagnetic launch represents an advanced direction in aircraft-carrier catapult technology and has far greater development potential than traditional steam catapults," Song said. "If the US gives up electromagnetic catapults and returns to steam catapults, that would be a technological regression and a step backward."
Echoing Song, Zhang said electromagnetic catapults offer more precise control of launch energy and broader compatibility with different types of carrier-based aircraft, while requiring less shipboard space than steam systems with their extensive high-pressure piping.
"Replacing EMALS with steam catapults on a Ford-class carrier already designed around electromagnetic launch would not only represent a technological step backward, but could also turn an attempt to reduce risk into a new source of engineering and system-integration risk," Zhang said.
。    8月26日讯 距离夏窗关闭仅剩不到一周的时间，然而曼城和利物浦今夏引援迟缓，在这方面落后卫冕冠军阿森纳，The Athletic记者Jordan Campbell发文对这一情况进行了解读。

二 | 在亚马逊最新推出的瓜迪奥拉纪录片《美丽的执念》中，曼城主席穆巴拉克坦言，让老将多留一个赛季的决定让他们付出了代价。

三 | CEO索里亚诺则表示，球队的“综合质量指数”——该数据与夺冠概率息息相关——已下滑至156，落后利物浦和阿森纳。利物浦夏窗迄今为止仅签下雅凯和穆尼奥斯两名新援，但后腰和边后卫位置的短板显而易见，红军依然没有找到萨拉赫的接班人，也尚未对此进行任何实质性补强。在新帅马雷斯卡和伊劳拉麾下，球队经历“成长的烦恼”本在情理之中。但新赛季首轮的较量彻底暴露了两队在人员配置上的明显隐患，伊劳拉更是直言自己的阵容“太过单薄”。由于在关键引援上拖延至此，两名主帅只能在赛季进行中磨合，新援们只能以赛代练、边踢边学，无法花上几周时间去慢慢消化复杂的战术理念。这种做法即便算不上失职，也绝对是低效的。TA指出，自2002-03赛季英超设立夏窗以来，“BIG6”有20%的转会支出集中在窗口最后一周。如果曼城和利物浦最终真的敲定重磅引援，那么今年夏天他们都将创下队史“最晚消费”纪录。此前这两家俱乐部在转会市场上向来都是早早敲定引援，通常7月初便“点击下单”完成“提货”，没有拉锯摩擦，极少压力焦虑。在“新战车”正式上路前，他们会留有数周时间来打磨这些“闪亮的拼图”。去年夏天，利物浦在6月便签下了弗林蓬、凯尔凯兹和维尔茨，7月又拿下埃基蒂克，唯一的例外是伊萨克。

四 | 相比之下，曼城的操作更是将“早”字体现得淋漓尽致。2017年是瓜迪奥拉对阵容进行全面大换血的一年，城市集团的智囊们精准剖析了那些常年多线夺冠球队的年龄结构，并迅速付诸行动：7月1日从本菲卡引进埃德森，同日从摩纳哥签下B席，7月17日从热刺引进凯尔·沃克，7月23日从皇马签下达尼洛，7月24日再从摩纳哥拿下本杰明·门迪，新阵容提前三周便全部就位。2018年，马赫雷斯在7月7日便加盟曼城。2019年，罗德里和坎塞洛分别在7月4日和8月7日前入队。

五 | 2021年，曼城在7月1日前敲定哈兰德。去年夏天，艾特-努里、赖因德斯和谢尔基均在6月初完成签约。

六 | 纵观队史，曼城此前仅有两次在赛季开打后还在进行重磅夏窗引援：一次是2020年9月的鲁本·迪亚斯，另一次则是去年9月签下多纳鲁马。

七 | 时过境迁，曼城今年在世界杯期间1.16亿英镑签下埃利奥特·安德森，但后续的引援工作却进展缓慢。事实上，他们直到最近才与里尔中场布阿迪达成协议，而这笔交易已经拖了整整一个夏天。切尔西甚至人为设定最后期限，逼迫曼城为恩佐支付1.2亿英镑。与此同时，曼城对水晶宫中场亚当·沃顿和伯恩茅斯中场斯科特的试探均遭拒绝，因此罗马中场科内也进入了他们的视野。随着萨维尼奥和马尔穆什双双转投热刺，曼城还急需寻找替代者，帕尔梅拉斯边锋阿兰·埃利亚斯的转会已接近完成。这是体育总监维亚纳改变策略导致转会操作延迟吗？一位匿名接受采访的体育总监表示，外界并不完全理解“账上有钱”“能够花钱”以及“遵守史上最严苛的财务规定”这三者之间的巨大差异。如今，即便是豪门也必须“先卖后买”，而阿森纳则是个例外。

八 | 自2022-23赛季跻身争冠行列以来，阿森纳尚未出售过任何一名一线队主力。

九 | 然而，如果马丁内利最终被高价出售，那他们此前买入措利斯的操作就仅仅是为了提前填补马丁内利离队后的空缺罢了。而曼城在球员出售方面做得极其出色，回笼了近4亿镑资金。

十 | 但等待球员出售完成后再进行引援的问题在于全世界都知道你有钱，这通常会导致被卖方狠宰一笔“豪门税”。曼城最新的纪录片为今夏的足坛格局提供了深刻的洞察，在这个夏窗，阿森纳成为了自上赛季初以来，英超前六球队中唯一没有更换主帅的俱乐部。曼城CEO索里亚诺坦言：“我们签下的球员都非常年轻，正处于一个全新周期的起点。

十一 | 而阿森纳引进的球员年龄偏大，平均年龄达到27岁。阿森纳追求的是即战力，而我们选择投资年轻球员。

十二 | 这是我们的选择，也是我们甘愿承担的风险。”阿森纳显然不愿冒这样的风险，他们敏锐地察觉到竞争对手们正处于动荡的过渡期，需要时间重建，而这正是枪手早已规划好的发力时刻。2019年底阿尔特塔接手球队时，正值曼城与利物浦双雄争霸的鼎盛时期。于是阿森纳制定了一个五年计划，预测双雄统治期自然衰退的节点，2023年至2027年就被枪手高层锁定为球队冲击巅峰的黄金窗口。阿森纳如今已具备冠军底蕴，正是乘势而上的大好机会。从纽卡签下吉马良斯，从维拉签下孔萨，这两笔转会充分彰显了球队“赢在当下”的决心。阵容更替规划、投资潜力球员、降低平均年龄……这些理念几乎成了现代足球战略的“圣经”。然而，对于顶级豪门而言，维持巅峰地位的压力始终存在，这就需要那些“来之能战”的成熟型球员。短短几年间，阿森纳从英超最年轻的球队变成了平均年龄最大的球队之一，但他们换来了宝贵的稳定性，这是千金难求的。阿森纳或许会重蹈曼城去年的覆辙，面临核心阵容保持时间过长的问题，衰退期也许会在明后年悄然降临。

十三 | 但如果签下正处于当打之年且证明过自己的冠军拼图能够带来一座座沉甸甸的奖杯，那绝对比盲目押注潜力而错失霸权要明智得多。

Current article:http://f0954s.aiwengchuanzuodahuai.shop/list_gs9szb/cxme7t.html

Published on:05:20:05